Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ

Home > Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ > Q&A

Á¦¸ñ Á¦´ëÀ§ÀÇ ¼ºÇØ/The Relics on Altar
ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ °ü¸®ÀÚ ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ 2016-04-12

 

 




Á¦´ëÀ§ÀÇ ¼ºÇØ/The Relics on Altar

Q ·¹³× ½ÅºÎ´Ô. Áú¹®ÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±³È¸ÀÇ Á¦´ëÃ༺¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀüÅëÀǽĿ¡ À־ ±× Á¦´ë°¡ ¹Ýµå½Ã ÀÖ¾î¾ß Çϳª¿ä? ƯÈ÷ Á¦´ë ¾È¿¡ ¼ºÀÎ(¼ø±³ÀÚ)ÀÇ ¼ºÇØ(á¡úµ)°¡ ¹ÚÇôÀÖ¾î¾ß Çϳª¿ä? ¸¸¾à ¼ºÀÎÀÇ ¼ºÇظ¦ ¾ò±â ¾î·Æ°Å³ª ¶Ç´Â ¼ºÇØ°¡ ÁøÂ¥ÀÎÁö ÀǽÉÀÌ °£´Ù¸é ¾î¶»°Ô µÇ³ª¿ä? ±× Á¦´ë°¡ Ã༺µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ³ª¿ä? ¸¸¾à ¼ºÇØ°¡ ¾ø´Ù¸é, ±× Á¦´ë À§¿¡¼­ Á¦ÇåµÇ´Â ¹Ì»ç´Â À¯È¿ÇÑ°¡¿ä?


A ¿¹, īŸÄÞ ½Ã´ëÀÌ·¡·Î, ¹Ì»ç´Â Ä¡¸íÀÚ(¼ø±³ÀÚ)ÀÇ ¼ºÇØ°¡ ´ã±ä Á¦´ë À§¿¡¼­ Á¦ÇåµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. °¡Å縯 ¹é°ú»çÀü¿¡ ¾²¿© Àֱ⸦: ¼º ½Ä½ºÅõ2¼¼(257-259)´Â ¹Ì»ç°¡ ¹Ýµå½Ã Á¦´ë(µ¹)À§¿¡¼­ ºÀÇåµÇ¾î¾ßÇÑ´Ù°í ¼­¼úÇϽŠÃÖÃÊÀÇ Àι°ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. µ¹ À§¿¡ »õ°ÜÁø 5°³ÀÇ ½ÊÀÚ°¡´Â ÁÖ´ÔÀÇ ¿À»ó(çéß¿)À» ³ªÅ¸³À´Ï´Ù. ¸®º£¸£ÀÇ ÆùƼÇÇÄ®¸®½º´Â Áø¼úÇϱ⸦, ¼º Æ縯½º 1¼¼°¡ ¡°¹Ì»ç´Â ¹Ýµå½Ã Ä¡¸íÀÚÀÇ ¹«´ý À§¿¡¼­ ºÀÇåµÇ¾î¾ß¡± ÇÑ´Ù´Â ¹ý·ÉÀ» Æ÷°íÇÏ¿´´Ù ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±×¶§ºÎÅÍ ±× °ü½ÀÀÌ ¹ýÀ̾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ½ÉÁö¾î ¾î·Á¿î »óȲ (±º´ë ¾ÈÀÇ »çÁ¦) Á¶Â÷¿¡¼­µµ ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ¼ºÇØ¿Í ´Ù¼¸ °³ÀÇ ½ÊÀÚ°¡°¡ »õ°ÜÁø Á¦´ë µ¹(¼º¼®)¾øÀÌ´Â, ¶Ç´Â ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑ ¼ºÇØ¿Í ½ÊÀÚ°¡ ÀÚ¼ö(í©â¹)°¡ ÀÖ´Â ±×¸®½º Á¤±³È¸ÀÇ ¼ºÃ¼Æ÷°¡ ¾øÀÌ´Â ¹Ì»ç°¡ Á¦ÇåµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò½À´Ï´Ù.


 ±×·±µ¥ (ÇöÀç ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â) »õ Àü·Ê´Â ¸Å¿ì À§¼±ÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »õ·Î¿î ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾ú½À´Ï´Ù;¡°¸¸¾à °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù¸é, Ä¡¸íÀÚÀÇ ¼ºÇظ¦ ³õ°Å³ª ¶Ç´Â Á¦´ë ¹Ù·Î ¾Æ·¡¿¡ ´Ù¸¥ ¼ºÀεéÀÇ ¼ºÇظ¦ ³õ´Â ·Î¸¶½Ä Àü·ÊÀÇ ÀüÅëÀº º¸Á¸µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ´ÙÀ½ »çÇ×ÀÌ ÁÖ¸ñµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.

 

 a) ±× ¼ºÇØ´Â ±×°ÍÀÌ »ç¶÷ ½ÅüÀÇ ºÎºÐÀ¸·Î¼­ ÀνĵǾîÁú ¸¸Å­ ÃæºÐÇÑ Å©±â¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ¾ÆÁÖ ÀÛÀº Ä¡¸íÀÚ³ª ¼ºÀÎÀÇ ¼ºÇØ´Â Á¦´ë ¾Æ·¡ Àý´ë ³õ¾Æ¼­´Â ¾È µÈ´Ù.

b) Àǹ®ÀÌ °¡´Â ¼ºÇØ°¡ ÁøÂ¥ÀÎÁö¸¦ °¡·Á³»´Â °ÍÀº Áö±ØÈ÷ Á¶½ÉÇؼ­ °áÁ¤Çؾ߸¸ ÇÏ°í.....


 ¿Ü°ß»óÀ¸·Î, ÀÌ ¹ý·ÉÀº ÀüÅë ÁöÅ°´Â °ÍÀ» ±Ç°íÇÏÁö¸¸, ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ °ÍÀ» ¿ä±¸ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

 

1/»À Á¶°¢ÀÌ ¾Æ´Ñ Àüü »À¸¦ ´ãÀº Á¦´ë¸¦ °¡Áø´Ù´Â °ÍÀº ¿ÀÈ÷·Á µå¹°°í, Ä¡¸íÀÚÀÇ ¸ðµç »À¸¦ ¾ò±â¶õ Áö±ØÈ÷ ¾î·Æ½À´Ï´Ù!

2/¿¹, ¼ºÇØ(á¡úµ)´Â ÁøÂ¥¿©¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

 

 ±×·¯³ª ¡®Áö±ØÈ÷¡¯ Ä¿´Ù¶õ °ËÁõÀÌ ¿ä±¸µÈ´Ù¸é , °áÄÚ ¸¸Á·À» ³»¸± ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù. ¿Ö³ÄÇÏ¸é ¸¹Àº »ç·Ê¿¡ À־,¼ºÇØ(á¡úµ)´Â ¼ö¼¼±â µ¿¾È Á¸ÁߵǾî¿ÔÁö¸¸ ±×·¯³ª ±× ±â¿øÀº ¿Ïº®ÇÏ°Ô ¹®¼­·Î ³²°ÜÀÖ´Â °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Ï±â¿¡ ¿À´Ã³¯ Çö´ëÁÖÀÇÀÚµéÀº ±×·± Çΰ踦 ÀÌÀ¯·Î ¼ºÇظ¦ ½±°Ô Æ÷±âÇعö¸³´Ï´Ù. ÀüÅëÀûÀ¸·Î ±³È¸´Â ¿À·§µ¿¾È ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼ºÇØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ °ø°æÀº Á¦´ë ¾È¿¡¼­ ¼ºÇظ¦ ¾µ ¸¸ÇÑ ÃæºÐÇÑ µµ´ö»óÀÇ È®½Ç¼ºÀ» ÁÖ´Â µ¥¿¡ À־ È®½ÇÇÑ Áõ°Å¶ó°í »ý°¢ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


 ¡®ÀüÅëÀ» ÁöÅ°´Â¡¯ ôÇÏ´Â ¹ý·ÉÀº ±×·¯³ª ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î (99%ÀÌ»ó)ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Àú´Â ±×°ÍÀ» À§¼±(êÊà¼)À̶ó ºÎ¸¨´Ï´Ù. Çö´ë±³È¸¿¡¼­ ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ²Ï ¸¹Àº »ç·Ê°¡ Àִµ¥, ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, ¼ºÃ¼¸¦ ¹Þ´Â °Í¿¡ °üÇÑ ¡°instruction Memoriale Domini¡± (1969³â5¿ù29ÀÏ)ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿ª»ç¿¡ °üÇÑ ÂªÀº °ËÅä°¡ ÀÖÀº ÈÄ ¿©·¯ºÐÀº ÀÌ ¹®¼­¸¦ ÀÐ°Ô µË´Ï´Ù:

 

¡°±×·¡¼­ Çô ¿µ¼ºÃ¼ÀÇ ±× °ü½ÀÀº ¿µ¼ºÃ¼ÇÏ´Â ÀÌÀÇ Çô À§¿¡ Ã༺µÈ »§ÀÇ ÀϺθ¦ ³õ´Â (Á¦´ë)°ü¸®ÀÚ –»çÁ¦- ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Á¦Á¤µÈ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿µ¼ºÃ¼¸¦ ºÐ¹èÇÏ´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀº Àü ¼¼°è ±³È¸ÀÇ ¿©°ÇÀ» °í·ÁÇØ º¼ ¶§, Çô ¿µ¼ºÃ¼°¡ Áö´Ñ ¼ö¼¼±â ÀüÅë »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ƯÈ÷ ¼ºÃ¼¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÅÀÚµéÀÇ °ø°æ½ÉÀ» Ç¥ÇöÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ¹Ýµå½Ã À¯ÁöµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù,¡± 

 

 ±×¸®°í ³ª¼­ ±× ¹ý·ÉÀº ±× ¹®Á¦¿¡ °üÇÑ ÁÖ±³µéÀÇ ±Ç°í¸¦ ¾ð±ÞÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¡°¼ö¸¹Àº ÁÖ±³µéÀº ÇöÀçÀÇ Á¾±Ô(ðóЮ)´Â º¯°æµÇ¾î¼­´Â ¾È µÈ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù. °Ô´Ù°¡ ¸¸¾à ±×·¸´Ù¸é º¯È­´Â ¹«·ÊÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.¡± ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ÀÌ°ÍÀÌ ¼ÕÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ¿µ¼ºÃ¼ÀÇ ¹®À» ¿­¾î³õÀº ºñ·Î ±× ¹®¼­ÀÔ´Ï´Ù! ¿¹Àü¿¡´Â ¸ðµÎ°¡ ´Ù ¾Æ¸§´ä´Ù°í »ý°¢Çß´ø °ÍÀ»....ÀÌ·± Á¡ÀÌ À§¼±ÀÎ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿ì¸®´Â ÇãÁ¡ÀÌ ¾øÀÌ ÀüÅëÀ» (¿Ïº®È÷)ÁöÄÑ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù!


ÇÁ¶û¼Ò¾Æ ·¹³× ½ÅºÎ (¼ººñ¿À10¼¼È¸ ¾Æ½Ã¾Æ °ü±¸)


 Q Father Laisney, I have a question to ask. In the traditional rite of the consecration of a church altar, is it obligatory for that altar, especially the high altar, to have a martyr's relic embedded in it? What if a martyr's relic is hard to get or the authenticity of the relic is doubted? Can that altar still be consecrated? If there is no relic at all, is the Mass celebrated on that altar valid?


A Yes, since the time of the catacombs, Mass was offered on an altar containing the relics of martyrs. The Catholic encyclopaedia says: St. Sixtus II (257-259) was the first to prescribe that Mass should be celebrated on an altar (of stone); the five crosses engraved on it signify His five wounds. The Liber Pontificalis states that St. Felix I decreed that Mass should be celebrated on the tombs of martyrs. That practice was law ever since. It was so true that it was not permitted, even in difficult situations (e.g. military chaplains), to offer Mass without an altar stone containing such relics and with those five crosses, or at least a Greek Corporal, also containing such relics and with embroidered crosses.


Now the New Liturgy, in a very hypocritical way, made a law: ¡°The tradition in the Roman liturgy of placing relics of martyrs or other saints beneath the altar should be preserved, if possible. But the following should be noted: a) such relics should be of a size sufficient for them to be recognized as parts of human bodies; hence excessively small relics of one or more saints must not be placed beneath the altar; b) the greatest care must be taken to determine whether the relics in question are authentic¡¦¡±

 

On the appearance, it recommends keeping the tradition, but then it makes requirements that practically make it impossible: 1/ it is rather rare to have altars with a whole bone, and not just a fragment of a bone, and it is most difficult to acquire such whole bones of martyrs! 2/ Yes, relics should be authentic, but it one asks the ¡°greatest¡± care, one would never be satisfied, because in many cases, the relics have been honoured for centuries and centuries, but their origin is not fully documented, and our modernists would simply discard them under that ground. Traditionally, the Church would rather consider that the continued veneration of such relics for a long time was sufficient proof to give the moral certitude which is sufficient to use them in an altar, or to venerate them.

 

A law that pretends to ¡°preserve Tradition¡±, but makes it practically impossible (in more than 99% of cases), I call that hypocritical. There would be quite a few such examples in modern ecclesiastical history. For instance, the ¡°instruction Memoriale Domini¡± on the reception of the Holy Eucharist (29 May 1969): you read in this document, after a short review of history: ¡°Thus the custom was established of the minister placing a particle of consecrated bread on the tongue of the communicant. This method of distributing Holy Communion must be retained, taking the present situation of the Church in the entire world into account, not merely because it has many centuries of-tradition behind it, but especially because it expresses the faithful's reverence for the Eucharist.¡± Then it mentions a consultation of what the bishops think on the matter and it concludes: ¡°the vast majority of bishops believe that the present discipline should not be changed, and that if it were, the change would be offensive.¡± Yet, this is the very document that opened the door to communion in the hands! All those beautiful considerations before¡¦ are rather hypocritical.

Keep the Tradition, without making loopholes!


 Fr.  Laisney(sspxasia)